Automation » Finance leaders talk automation, but their teams are still closing in excel

Finance leaders talk automation, but their teams are still closing in excel

As "Blue Monday" pressures mount, a new report reveals that 99% of finance leaders have automation ambitions, yet nearly half are stalled by an "Automation Deficit." This analysis explores why fragmented systems are creating a visibility crisis and how to bridge the gap between digital strategy and manual reality.

It is officially “Blue Monday,” that mid-January point where the holiday adrenaline has fully evaporated, leaving finance leaders staring down a mountain of year-end pressures and performance targets. For leadership teams returning to work this week, the primary source of stress isn’t just the cold weather; it’s the realization that despite a year of “digital transformation” promises, the back office is still being held together by spreadsheets and sheer willpower.

A new report released today by S&P 500 payments leader Corpay reveals a widening “Automation Deficit” a glaring gap between the high-tech ambitions of the C-suite and the fragmented, manual reality of day-to-day finance operations. While the buzz in boardrooms focuses on AI-driven forecasting and real-time treasury, the ground-level view for most UK and US finance functions remains stubbornly analog.

The Ambition vs. Reality Gap

The findings, drawn from Corpay’s independent research with 150 UK finance leaders, suggest that we have reached a plateau in digital adoption. While an overwhelming 99% of organizations have some level of automation planned for 2025 and 2026, the execution is hitting a brick wall.

The primary culprit is not a lack of budget or desire, but a lack of cohesion. The term “Automation Deficit” refers specifically to the disconnect between the tools CFOs want and the legacy systems they are currently tethered to.

The hurdles are significant:

  • 47% of finance leaders cite integration challenges as the single biggest barrier to successful automation.

  • 41% report that internal resistance to change continues to stall digital rollouts.

  • 37% remain paralyzed by concerns regarding cybersecurity and data privacy when moving sensitive financial workflows to the cloud.

These aren’t just technical glitches; they are strategic anchors. When nearly half of your peers are struggling just to get their software to “talk” to one another, the dream of a frictionless finance function feels further away than ever.

The Visibility Crisis at Year-End

In the current economic climate, “visibility” is the currency of leadership. The Corpay report highlights that 94% of respondents rate real-time oversight of finance and payments as a top priority. Yet the deficit persists because fragmented systems prevent that oversight from becoming a reality.

Consider the pressure of the current financial cycle. As businesses move toward the end of the financial year, the need for accurate forecasting, cost control, and cash flow management becomes non-negotiable. When systems are siloed with Accounts Payable (AP) in one tool, expenses in another, and cross-border payments in a third the CFO is essentially flying a plane with a 30-day delay on the fuel gauge.

This visibility gap is particularly dangerous during year-end scrutinies. “Fragmented systems slow down approvals, introduce unnecessary risk, and make real-time visibility difficult to achieve,” notes Piero Macari, Vice President of Products at Corpay. He argues that this deficit prevents leadership from moving at the speed required by modern markets.

The Hidden Costs: Fraud and System Flaws

The “Automation Deficit” isn’t just an efficiency killer; it’s a massive security risk. Manual processes are the primary entry points for both human error and malicious intent.

The whitepaper cites alarming data from the broader industry to contextualize the Corpay findings:

  • Systemic Weakness: KPMG research indicates that 57% of executives experience core system flaws every single week.

  • The Fraud Epidemic: UK Finance’s Annual Fraud Report shows that 3.31 million fraud cases were recorded in the UK in 2024 alone.

When finance teams rely on manual work for AP, expense management, and supplier verification, they are effectively leaving the door unlocked. These specific areas were identified by surveyed leaders as their top automation priorities, precisely because they are the most vulnerable to risk and visibility delays.

Closing the Deficit: The 2026 Roadmap

So, how does a finance leader bridge this gap?

The Corpay whitepaper argues for a shift away from “point solutions” individual tools that solve one problem in a vacuum and toward a unified “automation layer” that sits atop existing ERP systems.

The introduction of Corpay Complete in the UK market is a direct response to this need. By consolidating AP, domestic and international payments, expenses, and supplier management into a single, ERP-integrated platform, the goal is to replace manual effort with “clarity, control, and confidence”.

A Strategic Action Plan for Q1:

  1. Audit the “Hand-Offs”: Identify every point where data is manually exported from one system and imported into another. These are your primary deficit zones.

  2. Prioritize Integration over Features: A tool with fewer bells and whistles that integrates perfectly with your ERP is more valuable than a “best-in-class” tool that exists in a silo.

  3. Continuous Governance: Move from “detective” controls (finding errors during reconciliation) to “preventative” controls (stopping the error at the point of entry through automation).

Final Thoughts for the Fiscal Year

The “Automation Deficit” is essentially a tax on growth. Every hour a high-value finance professional spends manually reconciling a spreadsheet is an hour they aren’t spent on capital allocation, M&A analysis, or strategic scaling.

As we navigate the complexities of 2026, the competitive advantage will go to those who treat automation not as a series of disconnected IT projects, but as a unified core competency. The gap is real, but for those willing to address the “integration wall” head-on, the opportunity for increased performance and reduced risk is immense.

Share

Comments are closed.