How to improve ethical decision-making
As ethical behaviour grows in importance, companies are taking steps to improve their ethical decision-making. Praxity Global Alliance executive director Graeme Gordon discusses how to improve this process.
As ethical behaviour grows in importance, companies are taking steps to improve their ethical decision-making. Praxity Global Alliance executive director Graeme Gordon discusses how to improve this process.
In an age where being seen ‘to do the right thing’ is more important than ever, business ethics are increasingly viewed as a driver for success.
Ethical decision-making can reduce risks, minimise brand damage and create value. Moreover, organisations with a strong ethical standpoint are more likely to attract a new generation of ethically-minded consumers and jobseekers.
The term ethics usually refers to moral principles and norms by which human actions may be judged. In business, it impacts just about every decision made by any employee, director or owner, in any industry, from developing products and services to the way organisations interact with customers, suppliers, employees and society.
The International Federation of Accountants says a growing number of organisations go far beyond viewing ethical practice merely as a means to avoid penalties or fines. These organisations ‘believe corporate responsibility and ethical practices lead to sustainable value creation’.
So, how does an organisation, and indeed its stakeholders, go about making more ethically-sound decisions to add value?
There are two forces at play in ethical decision-making:
• Risk – how to mitigate the negative outcomes from potentially unethical decisions being made by a business
The question is: How can organisations and their employees make better judgements on a day to day basis, not only to minimise risk and brand damage but also to add value through ethical, sustainable practices?
Many business leaders believe the answer lies in putting a framework in place to help guide people on what action to take, but there is also an argument for better governance throughout an organisation to improve ethical decision-making.
The accounting profession has led the way when it comes to making ethics central to decision-making, principally with the Code of Ethics which every accounting professional must follow. In recent years, steps have been taken to improve training, while guidance is continually updated to encourage good practice.
The Association for Certified Chartered Accountants, for example, recently introduced a new Ethics and Professional Skills module into its qualification. The module is designed to allow professional accountants to demonstrate they understand and can apply ethical behaviour in complex real-world situations.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) believes ethics and integrity is very much the personal responsibility of every Chartered Accountant (CA), and this lies behind its ‘Power of One’ initiative. This calls on all CAs to ‘place ethical leadership at the heart of their professional responsibilities, to shape the culture and values of their organisations, to help re-establish ethics at the core of business practices and to rebuild public trust in business’. In turn, ICAS provides resources and support.
Ethical decision-making across all sectors boils down to values and the notion of being responsible. Individuals have to look at who they are working for and ask themselves ‘can I feel proud?’.
But while much of ethical behaviour is down to personal responsibility, can an organisation do more to ensure everyone is following the same guidelines when it comes to decision-making?
One approach which has gained credence in recent years is the creation of ethical frameworks for employees to follow. The idea is that putting a framework in place helps managers and employees understand the moral dimensions and implications of situations they might meet and helps them ask the right questions and work towards identifying solutions in line with the organisation’s values.
There are numerous models for creating a framework for ethical decision-making. The typical model consists of a series of questions or statements that help users clarify their thoughts and how they see an issue. The idea is to encourage managers and employees to assess a situation, decide what to do, agree a way forward, report and communicate.
The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, in Santa Clara University, California, produced the following framework for decision-making based on five sources of ethical standards – utilitarianism, rights, fairness or justice, common good and virtue:
The Markkula Center claims ‘having a method for ethical decision-making is absolutely essential. It adds ‘making good ethical decisions requires a trained sensitivity to ethical issues and a practiced method for exploring the ethical aspects of a decision and weighing the considerations that should impact our choice of a course of action’.
Many organisations have put in place similar frameworks, often supplemented with further questions and mechanisms to report unethical practices. The aim is to help employees decide what to do in different and often difficult situations.
However, putting in place a framework of this type is not enough by itself. Ethical decision-making is also about effective management and good governance.
The dilemma on ethical decision-making is not so much the framework and having policies and procedures in place, it’s about having the management awareness to know there’s a problem and how to deal with it. If the problem occurs at too low a management level and there’s no appropriate governance in place to identify and deal with issues, then the problem may not be resolved in accordance with the governing vision and principles of the business.
The importance of governance in the ethical decision-making debate was recently highlighted by Greg Medcraft, former chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, who now heads up the Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
In a speech about the ‘tone at the top’ of an organisation and its influence, conduct and culture, he stressed the need for boards to stay alert to ‘red flags’ such as inconsistencies and decisions that clash with stated values. He also highlighted the role of senior executives to create a culture where everyone has ownership and responsibility for ‘doing the right thing’, and that this should be cascaded down though an organisation, supported by training.
While Greg was talking about culture rather than ethics, they’re clearly intertwined. His comments underline that while everyone has a responsibility to improve the ethical decision-making process within an organisation, the board and senior executives need to ensure everything is in place to enable employees to do the right thing.
So, it would seem the best way to improve ethical decision-making is not only to create a clear framework, but to ensure the board and senior management set and communicate the right tone, backed by strong governance.
Better ethical decision-making can reduce risks and protect the goodwill of the business, while being consistent with profit motives. That’s a pretty strong argument for making sure ethics are at the core of an organisation.
Praxity Global Alliance is the world’s largest alliance of independent accounting and consulting firms. It has 65+ participant firms employing over 50,000 professionals in more than 110 countries. Member firms are handpicked for their size, strength, reputation, financial condition, leadership and strategic geographic relevance.